What’s in a question?

Question 1: What is your only comfort in life and in death?

Answer: That I, with body and soul, both in life and in death, am not my own, but belong to my faithful Savior Jesus Christ, who with His precious blood has fully satisfied for all my sins, and redeemed me from all the power of the devil; and so preserves me that without the will of my Father in heaven not a hair can fall from my head; indeed, that all things must work together for my salvation.  Wherefore, by His Holy Spirit, He also assures me of eternal life, and makes me heartily willing and ready from now on to live unto Him.

Both the Heidelberg Catechism and the Westminster Shorter Catechism set forth their purposes in their first question.  The Heidelberg sets out to explain the Christian’s “comfort” (assurance of salvation in Christ) and the Westminster Shorter, how God is to be glorified in mankind.  These goals are intimately related.

The difference in their first question may be partially explained by their differing historic contexts.  The Heidelberg was written in the midst of both persecution and confusion about the true gospel message, as many priests in the Late-Medieval Church had stripped Christians of their assurance of salvation in Christ and replaced it with works and ceremonies.  It was intended to function as a tool of pastoral care for these sick sheep.  The Westminster Shorter was written in the midst of theological debate.  It met their need for doctrinal clarity and consensus.  The two goals are entirely compatible; for, when someone knows gospel comfort, that person will respond by bringing glory to God.

Previous post:  What is a catechism?

Photo credit to Nataraj Metz

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “What’s in a question?

  1. Pingback: G + G + G –> Comfort | Cincinnati Reformed Church Planting

  2. My first comment didn’t apparently make it…

    I said the catechists were proto-Piperian – God is most glorified in us as we are most satisfied in him! 🙂

  3. hughmc5
    Sorry for the confusion with the comments. They’re set up to be approved before they show up on the blog.
    Did you coin “proto-Piperian”? 🙂
    There is definitely some overlap between his doctrine and the Reformed confessions/catechisms, but differences exist, too.
    Thanks for checking out the site. Stop back soon, and be sure to like us on Facebook!

  4. Pingback: The Knowledge of Misery | Cincinnati Reformed Church Planting

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s